Added ansys 2024R2

Adding Ansys 2024R2 per several requests (Hamza got one, I got one, Frank got one)

As is Ansys's habit, new acquisitions are thrown in there and "let's hope for the best everything works." Due to this, should we perhaps update the Ansys recipe before merging this? A find for bin directories shows a few more directories than we have on our modules:

$ find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -name bin
./Framework/bin
./autodyn/bin
./aisol/bin
./CFX/bin
./SystemCoupling/bin
./fluent/bin
./CFD-Post/bin
./TurboGrid/bin
./CEI/bin
./polyflow/bin
./dpf/bin
./aqwa/bin
./RSM/bin
./fensapice/bin
./ansys/bin
./Icepak/bin

Should we leave it as is, to prevent unintended consequences, or update the PATH to add the missing ones (which is easier said than done, since for some of them the actual bin dir is bin/linux64 or whatever.

requested review from @richart

assigned to @ddossant

added blocked-by-externals label

added ready-to-review label and removed blocked-by-externals label

removed ready-to-review label

Yes we can update the recipe to add the missing bin folders, to check if some LD_LIBRARY_PATH are necessary too or not

Concerning the recipe:

• I added a bunch of bin folders to the PATH.
• I removed the if condition concerning the LD_LIBRARY_PATH (those directories exist on every version)

I didn't add anything else to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH because it's a bit of a mess. For instance, multiple copies of boost and MKL coexist:

% find . -name libboost_regex.so -exec md5sum {} \;
c006a659c915829fa386f56d0f72b09f  ./Framework/bin/Linux64/libboost_regex.so
...
6c3d7662ce8f23f45aecad2b0911b20a  ./optiSLang/lib/libboost_regex.so
...
0e4ad39fedd347664e0229df81b55546  ./ansys/syslib/boost/libboost_regex.so

I assume they are somehow controlling for this and don't want to mess with it...

I jest looked quickly the recipe and saw LD_LIBRARY_PATH set but it is only for old versions

But the same directory structure exists in newer versions. If this had been an issue back then, it's likely an issue now as well...

But I understand your point, I'll put the if there again, so this won't be added then...

No one complained on the 2022 and 2024

OK, I undid the change concerning the LD_LIBRARY_PATH

approved this merge request

mentioned in commit dcce858a

merged