Treatment of B0 in mapping of equilibrium to IDS is inconsistent.
In my opinion, since no one expressed any objection to my last remark in meq#41, I think the
0.996 correction should be removed completely.
Should you choose to disagree, then the following errors/approximations in
matlab/TCV_IMAS/tcv_get_ids_equilibrium.m need to be addressed:
f_df_dpsicomes only from the plasma so the correction does not apply there.
fis not directly proportional to
f0, here the correction would be
f_new = sign(f0)*sqrt((0.996*f0)^2 + (f_old)^2 - (f0)^2)
Phiis also not directly proportional to
f0, you would have to recompute it from the new
- [ For
Phiin the limit of small diamagnetism they are indeed proportional to
qshould also have corrections but I do not see them (maybe they are elsewhere).